Now this glitch makes more sense
This commit is contained in:
parent
7ef198ec50
commit
886363b398
@ -1159,10 +1159,10 @@ void GB_apu_write(GB_gameboy_t *gb, uint8_t reg, uint8_t value)
|
||||
if (gb->apu.is_active[GB_WAVE]) {
|
||||
// Todo: I assume this happens on pre-CGB models; test this with an audible test
|
||||
if (gb->apu.wave_channel.sample_countdown == 0 && gb->model < GB_MODEL_AGB) {
|
||||
gb->apu.wave_channel.current_sample_byte = gb->io_registers[GB_IO_WAV_START + 5]; // what the actual fuck? Why specifically this wave address ?
|
||||
gb->apu.wave_channel.current_sample_byte = gb->io_registers[GB_IO_WAV_START + (gb->pc & 0xF)];
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (gb->apu.wave_channel.wave_form_just_read && gb->model <= GB_MODEL_CGB_C) {
|
||||
gb->apu.wave_channel.current_sample_byte = gb->io_registers[GB_IO_WAV_START + 0xA]; // what the actual fuck? Why specifically this wave address?
|
||||
gb->apu.wave_channel.current_sample_byte = gb->io_registers[GB_IO_WAV_START + (GB_IO_NR30 & 0xF) ];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
gb->apu.is_active[GB_WAVE] = false;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user